*An in-depth analysis of the most sweeping immigration restriction in recent U.S. history*
So many places are now banned, one can only wonder "where and what is next??" or "when will this end?
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRAVEL BAN
WHO is affected by the ban?
Nineteen countries face complete or partial travel restrictions:
Complete Entry Bans (12 countries)
- Afghanistan
- Chad
- Republic of Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eritrea
- Haiti
- Iran
- Libya
- Myanmar (Burma) -
- Somalia -
- Sudan -
- Yemen
Partial Restrictions (7 countries):
- Burundi
- Cuba
- Laos
- Sierra Leone -
- Togo
- Turkmenistan
- Venezuela
Additional 36 countries under review
(60-day deadline to comply or face restrictions):
Bhutan
Cameroon
Egypt
Nigeria
Majority located in Africa
What the ban entails:
The travel ban, which took effect June 9, 2025, represents the most expansive immigration restriction in recent U.S. history. It bars entry for citizens from twelve countries while imposing partial restrictions on seven others.
Key Statistics:
Combined visa issuances (May 2024-April 2025):
Over 150,000 visas were granted to travelers from the now-banned countries -
Most affected:
Afghanistan (37,164 visas),
Iran (23,154 visas),
Myanmar (15,206 visas)
Scale:
Broader than Trump's first-term travel ban, affecting more countries and people
Exemptions include:
Dual nationals -
Lawful permanent residents and immediate family
2026 World Cup participants
Certain diplomatic and humanitarian cases
WHERE
The impact is felt. The ban disproportionately affects
**Africa and the Middle East**, with countries experiencing:
**Active conflicts:** Sudan, Yemen, Myanmar, Somalia -
**Humanitarian crises:** Afghanistan, Haiti, Libya
**Authoritarian rule:** Eritrea, Equatorial Guinea, Chad -
**Geopolitical tensions:** Iran, Cuba, Venezuela Many of these nations are already dealing with internal turmoil, making the travel restrictions particularly devastating for refugees and those seeking safe haven.
This unfolded on June 4, 2025:
Trump signed the executive order on June 9, 2025:
The Ban took effect then Days later the New 2024 U.S. Administration identified 36 additional countries for potential inclusion with a 60-day deadline:
Countries under review must meet U.S. vetting standards or face restrictions
WHY?
The administration claims it's necessary
Trump's June 4 proclamation cited several justifications:
1. National Security Concerns: Claims these countries have "deficient" vetting processes
2. Visa Overstays: High rates of visitors not returning home
3. Deportation Issues: Countries refusing to accept U.S. deportees
4. Terrorist Threats: Allegations of "terrorist safe havens" and inadequate security
Controversial Justification:
Trump linked the policy to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, though the suspected attacker was from Egypt—a country not on the restricted list.
The Human Cost Behind the Politics
The numbers tell a stark story of human displacement:
Sudan: 30+ million people need humanitarian aid
Yemen: 21+ million require assistance due to decade-long civil war -
Myanmar: 3 million displaced by ongoing military conflict - Afghanistan: Severe human rights crackdowns under Taliban rule -
Haiti: Over 1 million internally displaced due to gang violence ##
What's Next?
The administration has indicated that countries can be removed from the list if they make "material improvements" to their vetting processes. Conversely, more countries could be added if new "threats emerge."
The 36 countries currently under review face a critical 60-day window to meet U.S. benchmarks or risk joining the banned list—a move that could affect millions more travelers and families.
Legal and Diplomatic Fallout:
Like Trump's first-term travel ban, this expanded version is expected to face immediate legal challenges in federal courts. Critics argue the policy amounts to discriminatory profiling based on religion and nationality rather than legitimate security concerns. The ban also threatens to damage U.S. diplomatic relationships and soft power, particularly in Africa and the Middle East, where many affected countries are located.
This analysis is based on reporting from the Council on Foreign Relations and official White House proclamations. The situation continues to evolve as legal challenges mount and diplomatic responses unfold.